Teams

FV:De Baeck/

2024 NCT Tri Level men · 3.5 Tri Level Men 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-03vs FV:The Framers:Allen/Won 10
W#1 DoublesLarry Hunt / Stephen Aronson vs Nathan Ravitz / Kyle Testerman6-3, 3-6, 6-3
2024-11-26vs BSF:Polhamus/GreenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLarry Hunt / Carlos Badiola vs Stephen Jewell / Bryon Remo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-11vs FV:The Framers:Allen/Won 10
W#1 DoublesLarry Hunt / Frederic de Baeck vs Josh Ferguson / Nathan Ravitz6-3, 6-2
2024-10-07vs BSF:Polhamus/GreenLost 01
L#1 DoublesLarry Hunt / Frederic de Baeck vs Ian Green / Bryon Remo2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-01vs FV:The Framers:Allen/Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Aronson / Carlos Badiola vs Max Castrogiovanni / Josh Ferguson2-6, 5-7
2024-09-25vs BSF:Polhamus/GreenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLarry Hunt / Frederic de Baeck vs Ian Green / Daniel Polhamus2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Tri Level Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSF:Polhamus/Green0633752
2FV:De Baeck/0642761
3FV:The Framers:Allen/0624861

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Larry Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Carlos Badiola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Frederic de Baeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Stephen Aronson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Aronson + Frederic de Baeck1937% games−6.9% vs expected
Carlos Badiola + Frederic de Baeck3256% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Aronson + Larry Hunt224 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Aronson + Carlos Badiola123 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Badiola + Larry Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Frederic de Baeck + Larry Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larry Hunt
79W–33L career · 9 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Carlos Badiola
67W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Frederic de Baeck
72W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Stephen Aronson
67W–92L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.