Teams

RBW-Legends-Dodd

2024 Adult 70 & Over · Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-19vs HBSQ-CaprettoLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Dodd / Don Bennett vs Nicholas Giordano / William Manson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Cole / Timothy Adams vs Brian Nelson / Peter Chang1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Sharer / Garold Jang vs Rich Schlachter / Suk Lee2-6, 1-6
2024-08-02vs HBSQ-AdeeLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Cole / Timothy Adams vs John MacDonald / Tom Breen2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesTerry Dodd / Douglas Scott vs Stevan Phillips / Dick Lunceford5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGarold Jang / Robert Sharer vs Gary Pilawski / Richard Kirst6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDon Bennett / Steven Cole vs Dick Lunceford / Matthew Berge6-2, 6-3
2024-06-18vs HBSQ-AdeeLost 02
L#2 DoublesTerry Dodd / Garold Jang vs Yun Hong / Jack Hagel1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Sharer / Steven Cole vs Joe Leinonen / Tom Breen3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HBSQ-Capretto60162586
2HBSQ-Adee4212613136
3AYTC (OUTDOORS) Aces-R-Fun-Edwards1541430184
4RBW-Legends-Dodd1541431196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Garold Jang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Terry Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Steven Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Timothy Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Hendricks
published
Douglas Scott
published
Garrett Mau
published
Gary Albert
published
Jim McGinley
published
Robert Sharer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Dodd + Steven Cole7453% gamesnot enough data
Terry Dodd + Garold Jang7460% gamesnot enough data
Steven Cole + Timothy Adams3349% gamesnot enough data
Garold Jang + Jim McGinley3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Garold Jang
45W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Terry Dodd
79W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Steven Cole
76W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Timothy Adams
37W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
David Hendricks
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Douglas Scott
33W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Garrett Mau
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gary Albert
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim McGinley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Sharer
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.