Teams

Hermitage-Martin

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-09vs Raintree-KallamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJon Nystrom / Michelle Wycinsky vs Hamid Mahmood / Mallika Chary7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs MTC-ScammellWon 10
W#3 DoublesAMY LINES / Jose Mendoza vs Pamela Stidham / Craik Goodspeed6-2, 6-0
2024-02-25vs MAC-SnowLost 01
L#3 DoublesAMY LINES / Jon Nystrom vs Zach Pettit / Heather Barefoot2-6, 6-5
2024-02-04vs ACAC-LockhartWon 10
W#1 DoublesJon Nystrom / Michelle Wycinsky vs Nathan Arland / Sandra Holahan6-2, 7-5
2024-01-28vs Westwood-KellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Jon Nystrom vs Michelle Baker / Jacob Dyer6-2, 4-4
2024-01-06vs ACAC-Nelson Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesSanjeev Vohra / AMY LINES vs Sung Kang / Grace Kim5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Michelle Wycinsky
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.96
AMY LINES
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Abbey Orski
published 4
3.72
Ryan Politowicz
published
3.69
Sanjeev Vohra
published
3.65
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.61
Daniel Sadusky
published 4
3.53
Joanna Bergeron
published
3.49
Janine Hoffer
published
3.35
Jon Nystrom
published
3.23
Sarah Martin
published
Kim Magnano
published
Will Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Martin + Will Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michelle Wycinsky
120W–74L career · 7 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
AMY LINES
219W–86L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Abbey Orski
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Ryan Politowicz
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Sanjeev Vohra
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Joanna Bergeron
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Janine Hoffer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Sarah Martin
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kim Magnano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Will Martin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.