Teams

Manor 3.5

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-04vs Franklin-BCC 3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesSherifa Fahmy / Melisssa Hacopian vs Catherine Byrne / Ivey Castleberry1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaureen Smith / Elena McCarthy vs Laura O'Keefe / Cady Burnes6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Valencia / Kelley Donellan vs Amanda Hewitt / Nicole Urbanczyk6-1, 6-2
2025-02-11vs Burns - Congressional 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKelley Donellan / Melisssa Hacopian vs Nina Price / Christy Sporidis6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiana DePaul / Katie Poulos vs Tracie Rolle / Andrea Cecchi4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSara Foulkes / Melissa Valencia vs Jennifer Minich / Christa Meyers1-6, 2-6
2025-01-24vs Girls Just Want to Have FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Smith / Katie Poulos vs Caroline Dennin / Kimberly Hayman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana DePaul / Sara Foulkes vs Regina Bodi / Elizabeth Walsh0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Valencia / Patty Lynch vs Linsey Goch / Margo Herron6-4, 6-1
2025-01-10vs LakewoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Johnson / Laura MECHAK vs Margaret Fitzwilliam / Debbie Senker3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Williams / Patty Lynch vs Alisa Talisman / Elizabeth Votaw2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Valencia / Sara Foulkes vs Pamela Gambon / Jennifer Shure4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kelley Donellan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Dawn Willard
published 3.5
3.44
Melisssa Hacopian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Diana DePaul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Maureen Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Meredith Webb
published
3.03
Melissa Valencia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Sara Foulkes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elena McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Dugan
published
Katie Poulos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura MECHAK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Muldonian
published
Patty Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sherifa Fahmy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Smith + Melissa Valencia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Donellan
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Dawn Willard
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Melisssa Hacopian
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Diana DePaul
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Smith
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Meredith Webb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Melissa Valencia
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Sara Foulkes
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Elena McCarthy
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Dugan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Poulos
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura MECHAK
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Muldonian
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Lynch
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherifa Fahmy
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.