Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CM8.5B

2024 COMBO · Men 8.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.18 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Ryan Stark
published
4.35
Dongkeun Lee
published 4.5
4.32
Brett Markowitz
published 4.5
4.32
Baxter Stein
published 4.5
4.30
Geoffrey Gerding
published 4.5
4.23
Brijen Thananjeyan
published 4.5
4.21
Robin Ferret
published
4.18
Matthew Fitzburgh
published
4.03
Paul Sampognaro
published
4.00
Diego Sabaris
published 4
4.00
Peter Stern
published
3.98
Lawrence Coburn
published
3.92
Matthew Sutherland
published
3.78
David Morin
published 4
3.74
Aref El Natour
published 4
3.72
Scott Schafebook
published
3.62
Gavin Jacobson
published 4
3.59
Seth Socolow
published
3.58
Olivier Jorda
published
3.54
Gregory Rojas
published 4
3.52
Francisco Tossi
published 3.5
3.40
Nikhil Desai
published
Jayon Wang
published
Leonard Chang
published
Nicholas Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Rojas + Lawrence Coburn3357% games+13.5% vs expected
Geoffrey Gerding + Lawrence Coburn5454% games+8.1% vs expected
Diego Sabaris + Lawrence Coburn213 matchesnot enough data
Lawrence Coburn + Seth Socolow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Stark
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
4.37
4.5
Dongkeun Lee
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Brett Markowitz
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Baxter Stein
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Geoffrey Gerding
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Brijen Thananjeyan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Robin Ferret
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
Matthew Fitzburgh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
4.18
Paul Sampognaro
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Diego Sabaris
29W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
Peter Stern
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
Lawrence Coburn
34W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
Matthew Sutherland
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
David Morin
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Aref El Natour
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Scott Schafebook
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Gavin Jacobson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.62
Seth Socolow
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
Olivier Jorda
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Gregory Rojas
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Francisco Tossi
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Nikhil Desai
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.40
Jayon Wang
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leonard Chang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicholas Clark
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.