Teams

Jones-CALHOUN

2025 CORTA 55 & Over Mixed Doubles Regional Championships · 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-23vs Medders-CORTALost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff McBrayer / Chris Tarpley vs Al Dean / Kerri Medders6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Angland / Tina Jones vs Donald Mizzell / Missy Mizzell2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJ David Smith / Renee McClanahan vs David Morris / Pam Knight3-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs Dexter-CORTAWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff McBrayer / Chris Tarpley vs Douglas Cole / Tracey Olds6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Higgins / Lisa Quinn vs Robert Dexter / Patricia Dexter6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJ David Smith / Renee McClanahan vs Rene Roberts / John Roberts3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-22vs Southern/Lau/55&O/7.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Tarpley / Jeff McBrayer vs Serena Lau / John Woody7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRenee McClanahan / James Angland vs Gregory Hadden / Sarah Delay4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Quinn / Scott Higgins vs Joseph Richard / Carol Tigar1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Lisa Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Chris Tarpley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
James Angland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Renee McClanahan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Scott Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
J David Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jeff McBrayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Tina Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Tarpley + Jeff McBrayer4250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Quinn
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chris Tarpley
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
James Angland
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Renee McClanahan
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Scott Higgins
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
J David Smith
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jeff McBrayer
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%7%93%
2.71
Tina Jones
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.