Teams

BAY:Amherst Gents:Roche

2023 WMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesChristopher Seibert / Chris Ferriter vs Eric Ceccotti / Kent Griffiths1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBen Lewis vs Jonathan Han4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Getler / Dave Butts vs Lawrence Eagan / Steve McKenna1-6, 4-6
2023-01-08vs ETC:Enfield Mayhem/MayoLost 04
L#1 DoublesChris Ferriter / Christopher Seibert vs Sean Smith / John Reisert6-4, 4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDave Butts vs Russell Tencer6-3, 0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Getler / Joe Meyer vs Jonathan Orenstein / Robert Campbell6-4, 1-6, 2-5
L#3 DoublesPeter Ghitman / Ben Lewis vs Ken Shell / Glenn Lungarini6-4, 3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesChris Ferriter / Christopher Seibert vs Eric Ceccotti / Kent Griffiths6-1, 3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPatrick Roche vs Sam Ho6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDave Butts / Ben Lewis vs Jonathan Han / Steve McKenna6-7, 7-6, 1-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Getler / Alden Booth vs Joshua Mansfield / Russell Moore6-4, 6-4
2022-10-30vs ETC:Enfield Mayhem/MayoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeremy Atkinson / Dave Butts vs Sean Smith / David Chassanoff7-5, 1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPatrick Roche vs Jonathan Orenstein6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBen Lewis / Christopher Bakriges vs Ira Mayo / John Reisert6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeter Ghitman / Henry Hardy vs Ken Shell / Jorge Messmer6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesChris Ferriter / Nathan Treloar vs T John Megas / Jonathan Han6-4, 1-6, 5-4
L#1 SinglesPatrick Roche vs Allen Fitzsimmons5-7, 4-5
L#2 DoublesRichard Getler / Alden Booth vs Michael Shields / Joshua Mansfield0-6, 1-6
2022-09-24vs ETC:Enfield Mayhem/MayoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKen Tereso / Jeremy Atkinson vs James Gagnon / Ken Shell6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPatrick Roche vs Jonathan Orenstein1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNiels Christiansen / Christopher Bakriges vs Brooke Tyler IV / Robert Campbell6-4, 3-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:The Enfield Slammers:Megas/Ciocca0616820200
2ETC:Enfield Mayhem/Mayo06131128256
3BAY:Amherst Gents:Roche0671736278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ben Lewis
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Dave Butts
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Patrick Roche
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Chris Ferriter
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.68
Christopher Seibert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Richard Getler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Peter Ghitman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Andrew Goodrich
published 3
Jeremy Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Meyer
published
Ken Tereso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nathan Treloar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Niels Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Ferriter + Christopher Seibert3447% games+5.8% vs expected
Patrick Roche + Ben Lewis5257% games+4.9% vs expected
Chris Ferriter + Ben Lewis19757% games+4.6% vs expected
Christopher Seibert + Niels Christiansen9362% gamesnot enough data
Richard Getler + Niels Christiansen5166% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Roche + Chris Ferriter3252% gamesnot enough data
Peter Ghitman + Richard Getler3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Lewis
98W–44L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Dave Butts
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Patrick Roche
66W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Christopher Bakriges
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Chris Ferriter
150W–42L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Christopher Seibert
47W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Richard Getler
126W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Peter Ghitman
79W–52L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3
Andrew Goodrich
15W–28L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Jeremy Atkinson
22W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joe Meyer
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Tereso
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Nathan Treloar
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Niels Christiansen
27W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.