Teams

UPTA18C/Russell/Kroc

2026 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Combo Men - 8.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
vs UPTA18C/Shinpoch/ACAC
The Salvation Army Kroc Tennis Center
Sep 19 9:00 AM
at UPTA18C/Wise/NeelyFarm
Neely Farm
2026-08-27vs UPTA18C/Reardon/ACACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCameron Wise / Bryce Geistfeld vs Kenneth Kolakowski / Steve Miller6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatrick OFriel / Patrick Dayton vs Sloan Garrett / Brian Tant2-6, 0-6
2026-08-15vs UPTA18C/Burns/CardinalSplit 11
L#2 DoublesXin Huang / Cameron Wise vs Patrick RICE / Patrick RICE4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPatrick Dayton / Bryce Geistfeld vs Benn Harmon / Brian Laufenberg6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 18+ Combo Men - 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA18C/Lane/Riverside3063996
2UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc2172881
3UPTA18C/Wise/NeelyFarm2163984
4UPTA18C/Sgro/GTC21451083
5UPTA18C/Shinpoch/ACAC12451390
6UPTA18C/Joffe/Thornblade0103637
7UPTA18C/Russell/Kroc0224862
8UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone02151057

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Belton Thomason
published 4.5
4.11
Cameron Wise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Patrick Dayton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Bryce Geistfeld
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Patrick OFriel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
Jonathan Shoultz
published
3.31
Nathaniel Futral
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Erik Russell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Russell + Nathaniel Futral4352% games+11.4% vs expected
Cameron Wise + Bryce Geistfeld4247% gamesnot enough data
Bryce Geistfeld + Patrick Dayton213 matchesnot enough data
Patrick OFriel + Nathaniel Futral213 matchesnot enough data
Erik Russell + Jonathan Shoultz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Belton Thomason
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Cameron Wise
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.11
Patrick Dayton
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Bryce Geistfeld
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Patrick OFriel
10W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.61
Jonathan Shoultz
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Nathaniel Futral
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Erik Russell
11W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.