Teams

Biloxi - Shoemake

2025 Adult 55 & Over-GC · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-28vs Savoy - DTWLost 12
L#1 DoublesJan Salloum / Julie West vs Lucy Stevens / Tina Brown6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Letonoff / April Mechatto vs Edye Austin / Gwen Urbati6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaula Moore / Candace McCarty vs Mary Kay Walk / Jennifer Hailes5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-15vs TOCC - Render-Leach 55sWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynette Cooper / Dianne Holloway vs Carla Cleary / Odile Million6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Marcel / Julie West vs Cynthia Render-Leach / Shari Pol6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCandace McCarty / Amanda Letonoff vs Charlene Langlinais / Darlene Nichols6-2, 6-2
2025-03-16vs TOCC - Render-Leach 55sWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Marcel / Phyllis Shoemake vs Cynthia Render-Leach / Lori Dewitt6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesApril Mechatto / Amanda Letonoff vs Mary Smith / Charlene Langlinais6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJan Salloum / Margaret Morgan-Bowman vs Odile Million / Elizabeth Mc MacKin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-13vs TOCC - Render-Leach 55sWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynette Cooper / Dianne Holloway vs Odile Million / Elizabeth Mc MacKin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Panter / Paula Moore vs Carla Cleary / Mary Smith6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargaret Morgan-Bowman / Phyllis Shoemake vs Shari Pol / Beth Gordin6-4, 6-1
2025-03-06vs Savoy - DTWWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynette Cooper / Amanda Letonoff vs Nicole Montagnet / Mary Ann Strickland7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Marcel / Julie West vs Lucy Stevens / Jennifer Hailes6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Howell / Christina Robinson vs Laurraine McKenzie / Tina Brown6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-16vs Savoy - DTWWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Letonoff / Christina Robinson vs Fran Seal / Mary Kay Walk6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Howell / Eileen Panter vs Mary Ann Strickland / Michelle Savoy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDianne Holloway / Margaret Morgan-Bowman vs Tina Brown / Laurraine McKenzie4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Eileen Panter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Dianne Holloway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Nancy Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Candace McCarty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Christina Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Amanda Letonoff
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Phyllis Shoemake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Lynette Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Margaret Morgan-Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
April Mechatto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.05
Jan Salloum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Marcel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Holloway + Lynette Cooper18169% games+7.9% vs expected
Amanda Letonoff + April Mechatto4257% games+7.7% vs expected
Jan Salloum + Christina Robinson134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Howell + Eileen Panter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eileen Panter
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Dianne Holloway
49W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Nancy Howell
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Candace McCarty
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Christina Robinson
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
4
Amanda Letonoff
32W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Phyllis Shoemake
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Lynette Cooper
42W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Margaret Morgan-Bowman
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
4
April Mechatto
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.20
Jan Salloum
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Laura Marcel
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Moore
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.