Teams

Net Blazers

2021 Prince George's Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-05vs Serving You FellasLost 01
L#1 DoublesAvraham Amram / Demetrius Crawford vs Tony Chin / Yong Kim2-6, 3-6
2021-05-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Filip Stojkovski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Zehr / Donnie Reyes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-16vs Serving You FellasLost 01
L#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Michael Zehr vs Christopher Andall / Clifton Wynter2-6, 1-6
2021-05-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Michael Zehr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-02vs Serving You FellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Zehr / Demetrius Crawford vs Segun Eubanks / Yong Kim4-6, 6-5
2021-05-01vs Team ZimmermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Smith / Michael Zehr vs Michael Kilberg / Richard Laukitis4-6, 5-7
2021-04-24vs Serving You FellasWon 20
W#1 SinglesAvraham Amram vs Bryan Williams6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Michael Zehr vs Matthew Ganney / Clifton Wynter6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-18vs Team ZimmermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesAvraham Amram / Demetrius Crawford vs Michael Kilberg / Daniel Contreras4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonnie Reyes / Michael Zehr vs Fabrizio Cariani / Burke Reynolds6-2, 6-4
2021-04-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesAvraham Amram / Filip Stojkovski vs Adam Alfano / Burke Reynolds6-2, 6-4
2021-04-03vs Serving You FellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Michael Zehr vs Ron Best / Segun Eubanks2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Richard Sexton
published
3.73
Demetrius Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Avraham Amram
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Michael Zehr
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Demetrius Crawford + Richard Sexton2543% games+2.3% vs expected
Demetrius Crawford + Michael Zehr4548% gamesnot enough data
Demetrius Crawford + Avraham Amram3343% gamesnot enough data
Avraham Amram + Michael Zehr4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Sexton
32W–36L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Demetrius Crawford
204W–161L career · 12 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Avraham Amram
100W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Michael Zehr
90W–93L career · 8 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.