Teams

SMU/Lu X9.0

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & over MIXED Sunday · X9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-11vs Wagon Wheel/Longoria X9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesColton Rupkey / Katie Winston vs Seth Harris / Tara Murphy6-2, 6-3
2024-07-21vs Greenhill/Tada X9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesColton Rupkey / Katie Winston vs Josh Alexander / Eri Matsumoto6-1, 6-1
2024-06-30vs Wagon Wheel/Longoria X9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesVictoria Turck / Colton Rupkey vs Seth Harris / Megan Klauser6-4, 7-5
2024-06-02vs Greenhill/Tada X9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Lu / Colton Rupkey vs Areli Martinez / Ryan Morton6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for X9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
4.42
Caroline Shewmaker
published 4.5
4.39
Wilson Johnson
published
4.33
Colton Rupkey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Emily Lu
published
4.13
Jarod Sweetland
published
3.88
Alan Liao
published 5
Hannah Park
published
Katie Winston
published
Kyle Knight
published
Lisa Roslanova
published
Michael Frajkor
published
Samuel Fox
published
Victoria Turck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Frajkor + Victoria Turck123 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Park + Jarod Sweetland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brandon Underwood
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.76
4.5
Caroline Shewmaker
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
4.42
Wilson Johnson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.39
4.5
Colton Rupkey
115W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Emily Lu
19W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Jarod Sweetland
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
5
Alan Liao
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
3.88
Hannah Park
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Winston
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kyle Knight
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Roslanova
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Frajkor
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samuel Fox
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Turck
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.