Teams

N OR-SHC-Farrell

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Steve Fogg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.82
Jeroen Swanborn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Patrick Trank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Chris Eddy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Bruce Trubo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Trank
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Bill Rhoades
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Clark Cosart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Daniel Heck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Russ DeMoss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mike Booth
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results9 ties
2022-12-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKiersten Lake / Mike Booth vs Cheri Martes Davis / James Lawrence6-4, 6-2
2022-11-12Won 21
L#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Bruce Trubo vs Todd Eckelman / Patrick Herbst6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Joseph Collins vs William Hergenhan / Christopher Graham7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClark Cosart / Russ DeMoss vs James Hockley / Rudy Martinez5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-05Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Heck / Alex Pulaski vs Deepak Kumar / Neil Soiffer1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Fogg / Bruce Trubo vs Sam Aiello / Kirk Planck6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMike Farrell / Mike Booth vs Patrick Harkin / Tony Moreno7-6, 6-4
2022-10-29Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Eddy / Bill Rhoades vs Ken Nichols / John Droege6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Trubo / Steve Fogg vs David Finkelman / Andrew Kohlmetz6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Trank / David Meisels vs William Malloch / Gary Chin6-4, 7-6
2022-10-23Won 21
W#1 DoublesChris Eddy / Jae Joon Kang vs Carlin Jackson / Ramon Delapaz6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteve Fogg / Joseph Collins vs Tom Lonergan / Lance Berkey6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Farrell / Mike Booth vs Steve Carns / Craig Mills6-0, 7-6
2022-10-09Won 21
W#1 DoublesClark Cosart / Jae Joon Kang vs Tim Luangrath / Tony Khamsouk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Trank / Matthew Trank vs Dave Vinik / Jim Wheeler7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChris Eddy / William Anderson vs Frank Olson / John Christiaan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-08Won 21
W#1 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Mark Stephenson vs Dean Gaylor / Peter Schulte6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMike Farrell / Mike Booth vs JT Smith / Michael Kazangian6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJae Joon Kang / Daniel Heck vs Steve Sun / Andy LaFrazia6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Trank / Matthew Trank vs Bill Henderson / William Campbell6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Eddy / William Anderson vs Kit Johnson / John Popplewell6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBill Rhoades / Mike Booth vs Jonathan Barg / David Hill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesChris Eddy / William Anderson vs Bob Bedritis / Charlie Dolezal6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Joseph Collins vs Perry Sides / Jeffrey Gates6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Steve Fogg
84W–67L career
0%99%1%
4.22
4
Jeroen Swanborn
67W–46L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Patrick Trank
87W–59L career
1%98%1%
3.79
4
Chris Eddy
63W–53L career
6%91%4%
3.75
4
Bruce Trubo
24W–7L career · type M
not enough data
4
Matthew Trank
78W–63L career
3%97%0%
3.68
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
43%57%0%
3.46
4
Clark Cosart
61W–38L career
51%49%0%
3.44
3.5
Daniel Heck
12W–33L career
0%87%13%
3.42
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%97%3%
3.38
0
Mike Booth
15W–18L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.