Teams

Murphy/DV/Foothills

2022 Foothills Spring 55 & Over League · Women 4.0 - Sunday afternoon

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-10vs Ray/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Valerie Craig vs Rosa Szalanski / Elaine Myers5-7, 4-6
2022-04-03vs Ray/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarol Almond / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Elaine Myers / Rosa Szalanski6-0, 6-0
2022-03-27vs Ray/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Murphy / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Suzanne Davis6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarol Almond / Kathleen Graham vs Brenda Isenhour / Rosa Szalanski6-0, 6-1
2022-03-20vs Ray/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Kathleen Graham vs Rosa Szalanski / Elaine Myers6-1, 6-4
2022-03-06vs Ray/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsey Linker / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Connie Kleeves / Michele Mcbride6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Almond / Kathleen Graham vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Suzanne Davis6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 - Sunday afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Mary Sheryl Horine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Carol Almond
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Pam Muncy
published
Dru Henson
published 4
3.59
Kathleen Graham
published
3.45
Kimberly Church
published
Linda Robinson
published
Lindsey Linker
published
Valerie Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dru Henson + Linda Robinson9265% games+2.4% vs expected
Carol Almond + Mary Sheryl Horine28961% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Sheryl Horine
71W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Carol Almond
117W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Pam Muncy
31W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Dru Henson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Graham
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kimberly Church
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
Linda Robinson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsey Linker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Craig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.