Teams

CCW GANN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-21vs LTFCS DARKWon 10
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Troy Kittelson vs Michael Nicolls / Angelito Sarmiento6-2, 6-3
2021-07-09vs CSRC EVANSWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrad Michelson / Troy Kittelson vs Richard Riley / Wayne Wolfe6-1, 6-2
2021-07-07vs MEMPK WITHEROWWon 20
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Brad Michelson vs Daniel Phillips / Loren Iten6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBradford Gann / Troy Kittelson vs Zach Barker / Brian Blitch6-1, 6-2
2021-06-30vs CSRC EVANSWon 20
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Michael Cook vs Mike Guinn / Tom Brokaw6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTroy Kittelson vs Robert Hedges6-1, 6-1
2021-06-23vs MEMPK BODLAKLost 01
L#1 SinglesLance McClelland vs Babu Herunde Prakash1-6, 4-6
2021-06-16vs LTFCS DARKWon 10
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Brad Michelson vs Cederick Dark / Jared Welch6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lance McClelland
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Don Borchelt
published 3.5
3.24
Troy Kittelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Nathan Pritchard
published
2.93
Brad Michelson
published 3.5
2.78
Terry Newton
published
Bradford Gann
published
Kurt Reno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance McClelland + Troy Kittelson11756% games+5.1% vs expected
Nathan Pritchard + Troy Kittelson7650% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lance McClelland
89W–59L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Don Borchelt
26W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Troy Kittelson
69W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Nathan Pritchard
24W–34L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
3.5
Brad Michelson
22W–44L career · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
Terry Newton
32W–31L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
Bradford Gann
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kurt Reno
18W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.