Teams

LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.0 WD

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 3.0 WD

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-17vs LA - Net Flicks & ChillWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristina Barragar / Soleil Blaize vs Jodi Chall / Bethany Nelson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-11vs SoCal/Shafrir/18&Over3.0FWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnie Carmona / Jasmin Miller vs Kimberly Ndombe / Tanya Kripalani3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-29vs LA - Fuzz OffLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Cho / Annie Carmona vs Sally Triphon / Nas Cohen1-6, 5-7
2025-05-14vs LA - Tightly Strung WDLost 01
L#3 DoublesSoleil Blaize / Caroline Tran vs Pilar Bernard / Kyoko Arikura6-7, 6-7
2025-05-07vs SoCal/Shafrir/18&Over3.0FLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoy Cho / Annie Carmona vs Amanda Kain / Uyen Chu5-7, 3-6
2025-04-23vs LA - Fuzz OffLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Carmona / Joy Cho vs Roopika Malhotra / Sally Triphon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Debbie Maringka
published 3.5
3.24
Joy Cho
published
3.17
Jennifer Sung
published
3.04
Jasmin Miller
published
3.02
2.98
Annie Carmona
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Elaine Low
published
2.83
Janelle Brown
published
2.73
Soleil Blaize
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Susan Mondt
published
Tracy Herriott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Cho + Jasmin Miller9359% games+14.6% vs expected
Janelle Brown + Annie Carmona5450% games−1.2% vs expected
Joy Cho + Annie Carmona3349% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Low + Janelle Brown3350% gamesnot enough data
Joy Cho + Debbie Maringka5067% gamesnot enough data
Christina Barragar + Annie Carmona303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Sung + Debbie Maringka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Maringka
27W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Joy Cho
37W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.24
Jennifer Sung
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jasmin Miller
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.04
3
Christina Barragar
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Annie Carmona
83W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Elaine Low
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Janelle Brown
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.83
3
Soleil Blaize
58W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Mondt
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Tracy Herriott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.