Teams

Brian Powell X6.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over MIXIN' IT UP Weekend Event · X6.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-26vs Courtney Vorel/Lance Christian X6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesNatalie Edmondson / Matt Ludwick vs Dustin Hickey / Christina Hickey0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Russo / Brian Powell vs Lance Christian / Sabrina Greene7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Russo / Brian Powell vs Paula Ramirez-White / Chad Stansell4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStacie Markley / Hank Bowling vs Delores Rodriguez / Howard Michael Ableman5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesNatalie Edmondson / Matt Ludwick vs Delores Rodriguez / Lance Christian3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStacie Markley / Hank Bowling vs Sabrina Greene / Hector Medina0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Russo / Brian Powell vs Courtney Vorel / Paul Snitker2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Edmondson / Matt Ludwick vs Dorothy Buechel / Howard Michael Ableman6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesStacie Markley / Hank Bowling vs Paula Ramirez-White / Chad Stansell1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · X6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Courtney Vorel/Lance Christian X6.040102464
2Brian Powell X6.00421020137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Amy Russo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
CRYSTAL BOWLING
published 3
2.69
Natalie Edmondson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Stacie Markley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hank Bowling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Ludwick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Markley + Natalie Edmondson0530% gamesnot enough data
Stacie Markley + Amy Russo033 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Markley + Hank Bowling033 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Edmondson + Matt Ludwick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Russo
28W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
CRYSTAL BOWLING
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Natalie Edmondson
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Stacie Markley
2W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Hank Bowling
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Ludwick
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.