Teams

Ross - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-12vs Lochas - RS HardWon 41
W#1 DoublesKadi Taylor / Malu Dunn vs Maggie Lochas / Jacqueline Pommerening6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCheryl Vann vs Nikki Bucco4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Way / Candy Zuleger vs Haley Allen / Katie Gross6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesNatalia Burroughs vs Erin Nunnari6-2, 6-6
W#3 DoublesHeysi Mcmillon / Fernanda Zamorano Rozas vs Kristen Sitton / Wendi Best6-4, 6-1
2025-05-08vs Leonard - RS HardWon 41
L#1 DoublesCheryl Vann / Kaye Whittenberger vs Amatul Bean / Reghan Robinson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHannah Pfeifler vs Rhonda Springer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Ross / Malu Dunn vs Olivia Johnson / Lindsey Chadbourne6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNatalia Burroughs vs Kiley Leonard6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Way / Candy Zuleger vs Roxolana Slobodian / Lisa Streete6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Susan Rice
published
3.02
Cheryl Vann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Kaye Whittenberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Kadi Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Danielle Turner
published 3
2.86
Kathy Ross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Heysi Mcmillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Fernanda Zamorano Rozas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Natalia Burroughs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Marianna Massey
published
2.64
Malu Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Candy Zuleger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Hannah Pfeifler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fernanda Zamorano Rozas + Heysi Mcmillon3256% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Ross + Malu Dunn314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Ross + Susan Rice404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Rice
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Vann
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Kaye Whittenberger
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kadi Taylor
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Danielle Turner
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kathy Ross
24W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Heysi Mcmillon
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Fernanda Zamorano Rozas
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Natalia Burroughs
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Marianna Massey
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Malu Dunn
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Candy Zuleger
16W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Hannah Pfeifler
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.