Teams

MEMPK DECAIRES

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-18vs CCOC JAMISONWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Vanderbeck / Kathy Eaton vs Emilie Rudolph / Melissa Jamison7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Pennino vs Erica Hoffman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrittany DeCaires / AnnaMarie Bugosh vs Melissa Hocate / Austin Lawhorn2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
AnnaMarie Bugosh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Sarah Vanderbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Brittany DeCaires
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Stacey Self
published
2.78
Kathy Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Sims
published 3
2.65
Lisa Pennino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Vanderbeck + Kathy Eaton14659% games+3.5% vs expected
Stacey Self + Kathy Eaton123 matchesnot enough data
Brittany DeCaires + AnnaMarie Bugosh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AnnaMarie Bugosh
33W–5L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Vanderbeck
25W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Brittany DeCaires
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Stacey Self
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kathy Eaton
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Anne Sims
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Pennino
10W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Annamarie Brachfeld
2W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.