Teams

Toro

2026 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over Spring · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over Spring 6.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-09-01vs WalshLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Dolvin / Randall Henigin vs George Briscoe / William Kamenoff1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJose Toro / Mahmood Solaiman vs Russell Maxwell / Steven Edwards6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRaymond Lyons / Philip Henry vs Richard Abels / William Norman0-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs EstradaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Henry / Charlie JONES vs Edward Spears / Chris Hofer6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJose Toro / Jeffery Tolliver vs Cary Sanders / Hal Bloom3-6, 2-6
2026-08-07vs WalshLost 03
L#1 DoublesJose Toro / Jeffery Tolliver vs William Kamenoff / George Briscoe5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / William Davenport vs Anthony Perotti / Douglass Lamartin4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCharlie JONES / Philip Henry vs Russell Maxwell / Mike Spivey4-6, 1-6
2026-07-29vs EstradaLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Davenport / Michael McNees vs Hal Bloom / Melvin Williams1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDana Dolvin / Jose Toro vs Chris Hofer / Cary Sanders4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharlie JONES / Raymond Lyons vs Bryant Centofanti / Elmer Buddy Baylor7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-24vs EstradaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael McNees / William Davenport vs Hal Bloom / Cary Sanders2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / Philip Henry vs Melvin Williams / Chris Hofer2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeffery Tolliver / Jose Toro vs Jonathan Gladstone / Bryant Centofanti6-1, 6-3
2026-07-17vs WalshLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhilip Henry / William Davenport vs Mark Rossi / Mike Spivey6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / Dana Dolvin vs George Briscoe / Richard Abels2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeffery Tolliver / Jose Toro vs Douglass Lamartin / William Kamenoff6-0, 6-4
2026-06-26vs WalshLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Davenport / Michael McNees vs Mark Rossi / Mike Spivey1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDana Dolvin / Jose Toro vs Steven Edwards / Richard Howard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRaymond Lyons / Mahmood Solaiman vs Tom Walsh / Douglass Lamartin5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over Spring 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Jeffery Tolliver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Charlie JONES
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.79
Dana Dolvin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Michael McNees
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Mahmood Solaiman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.37
Raymond Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Randall Henigin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Philip Henry
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
William Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffery Tolliver + Jose Toro224 matchesnot enough data
William Davenport + Michael McNees033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jeffery Tolliver
41W–17L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Charlie JONES
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Dana Dolvin
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Michael McNees
18W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Mahmood Solaiman
79W–158L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Raymond Lyons
21W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
3
Randall Henigin
6W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
Philip Henry
1W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Davenport
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.