Teams

Hosemann, J.D.

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Men 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs Dutta, SouravLost 12
W#1 SinglesJD Hosemann vs Drew Green6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKevin Hemphill vs Adam Byrd1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesNico Jimeno vs Dante Grant6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-12-17vs Pace, PhillipWon 21
L#1 SinglesJohn Patton vs Ben Berry3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNico Jimeno vs James Moseley6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSeth Hudspeth vs Byron Galloway7-5, 6-0
2024-12-15vs Hixson, BrytonWon 30
W#1 SinglesKevin Hemphill vs Larry Campbell6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJohn Patton vs Brandon Norton6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSeth Hudspeth vs Steve Summers6-4, 6-3
2024-11-24vs Pace, PhillipWon 21
L#1 SinglesNico Jimeno vs Ben Berry2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJohn Patton vs Mitch Stentiford6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesSeth Hudspeth vs Byron Galloway6-3, 6-3
2024-11-17vs Alexander, AlexWon 21
W#1 SinglesJohn Patton vs Austin Sartin6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSeth Hudspeth vs Alex Alexander7-6, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKennedy Miller vs Chad Myers2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-27vs Hixson, BrytonWon 21
W#1 SinglesJD Hosemann vs Bryton Hixson7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNico Jimeno vs Brandon Norton6-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKevin Hemphill vs Christopher Mays6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Nico Jimeno
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.35
JD Hosemann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.19
John Patton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.12
Seth Hudspeth
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.06
Brett Knight
published 3.5
2.92
Kennedy Miller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Kevin Hemphill
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JD Hosemann + Nico Jimeno4165% games+11.3% vs expected
Kennedy Miller + Seth Hudspeth1449% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nico Jimeno
42W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
JD Hosemann
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
John Patton
47W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
Seth Hudspeth
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Brett Knight
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kennedy Miller
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kevin Hemphill
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.