Teams

DNagelhout-HS

2026 Eno River Mixed 65 & Over · 65 & Over Mixed 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.89 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-08vs SRochkind-UNCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMike Kempel / Linda Nagelhout vs Rick Edmunds / Katherine Zeph6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Bay Scott vs Robert Crane / Susan Bernstein4-6, 4-6
2026-07-21vs CKnudson-CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesDave Thomas / Louise Tabron vs Elaine Bardes / Stanley Brugler6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMike Kempel / Dori Liller vs Alice Stenstrom / Bill Baas6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Lisa York Russo vs Judy Croan / Jerome Croan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-14vs SRochkind-UNCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDave Thomas / Lisa York Russo vs Rick Edmunds / Katherine Zeph2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMike Kempel / Bay Scott vs Steven Rochkind / Jean Elia6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Naden / Louise Tabron vs David Molpus / Carla Wertheimer2-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs CKnudson-CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesVan Blalock / Linda Nagelhout vs Alice Stenstrom / Chester Hwang2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMike Liller / Lisa York Russo vs Claire Blackwelder / Bill Baas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Dori Liller vs Judy Croan / Jerome Croan6-4, 6-2
2026-06-16vs SRochkind-UNCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Kempel / Dori Liller vs Jean Elia / Robert Long6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMike Liller / Linda Nagelhout vs Susan Bernstein / David Molpus6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Louise Tabron vs Katherine Zeph / David Hilsabeck6-1, 7-5
2026-06-09vs CKnudson-CPWon 20
W#1 DoublesDave Thomas / Dori Liller vs Elaine Bardes / Stanley Brugler7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDarrell Bradfield / Linda Nagelhout vs Jan Hagerty / Charles Knudson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs SRochkind-UNCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDave Thomas / Bay Scott vs Rick Edmunds / Carla Wertheimer3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMike Kempel / Louise Tabron vs Robert Long / Katherine Zeph6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDarrell Bradfield / Lisa York Russo vs Steven Rochkind / Jacquelyn Bartlett5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-19vs CKnudson-CPWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Linda Naden vs Claire Blackwelder / Bill Baas1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMike Kempel / Louise Tabron vs Elaine Bardes / Chester Hwang7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVan Blalock / Dori Liller vs Judy Croan / Jerome Croan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Mixed 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Mike Kempel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Dave Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Louise Tabron
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Darrell Bradfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Mike Liller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Linda Nagelhout
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
David Nagelhout
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Van Blalock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.56
Dori Liller
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Bay Scott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.32
Linda Naden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
David Naden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nagelhout + David Nagelhout134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Nagelhout + Van Blalock224 matchesnot enough data
Dori Liller + David Nagelhout213 matchesnot enough data
Dori Liller + Van Blalock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Kempel
27W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.33
3
Dave Thomas
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Louise Tabron
30W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Darrell Bradfield
7W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Mike Liller
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Linda Nagelhout
45W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
David Nagelhout
44W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Van Blalock
20W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65
3
Dori Liller
104W–101L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40
Linda Naden
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
2.5
David Naden
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.