Teams

11-SHealey-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-05-04Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Lauren Muth Humphreys4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSmita Shukla / Katie Sanders vs Kristi Laan / Amy Gillespie0-6, 1-6
2022-05-02vs 9-SBrogden-Eno-18+Won 20
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Berna Tareen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Cheryl Smyth vs Susan Brogden / Miho Ogura6-3, 6-3
2022-04-27vs 10-MMurr-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Owen / Cheryl Smyth vs Katharine Colvin / Kaitlyn O'Neill6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSmita Shukla / Dawn Kleinman vs Emma Gould / Blakeley Pritchard1-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs 1-CMurray-HRWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Laura Rendon vs Carrie Norry / Jennifer Gillie0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Kateri Salk-Gundersen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Owen / Carolina Robayo vs Karen Scherr / Scarlet Dial6-4, 7-5
2022-04-13vs 5-KTodd-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Rendon / Carolina Robayo vs Beth Nelson / Shannon Littleton6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSmita Shukla / Cindy Bohlin vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey / Holly Atkinson3-6, 2-6
2022-04-06vs 4-TBrooks-ENO-3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Owen / Cheryl Smyth vs Laura McNiven / Lauren Triebert3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Button Hall6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLaura Rendon / Carolina Robayo vs Kelly Townsend / Terry Perrone2-6, 3-6
2022-04-04vs 3-KDonica-EnoWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheza Healey / Mary Jo Dunnington vs Michele Freiburghouse / Lisa Buckley7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Sarah Poulsen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSmita Shukla / Carolina Robayo vs Kimberly Donica / Sarah Franks2-6, 4-6
2022-03-28Won 30
W#1 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Sarah Owen vs Anna Mercer-McLean / Jennifer Catanzaro6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Reena Patel Bland6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Carolina Robayo vs Cheryl Stewart / Sarah Mosier6-1, 6-1
2022-03-14vs 6-MLong-Eno18+ 3.5Won 30
W#2 DoublesCindy Bohlin / Smita Shukla vs Mary T Long / Kari Lovetinsky6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCheryl Smyth vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Katie Sanders vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Sarah Owen vs Diane Adams / Roberta Hadley6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Anna Tomkins6-7, 0-6
2022-02-28Split 11
L#1 DoublesCarolina Robayo / Laura Rendon vs Katie Naftel / Allison Stewart-Smull5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesCheryl Smyth vs Carli Opland6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-21vs 12-SEasterling-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheza Healey / Cheryl Smyth vs Mary Susan Easterling / Caroline Hamilton0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Sarah Owen vs Linsey Hughes / Marie Hansen6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCindy Bohlin / Smita Shukla vs Nancy Pike / Jane Waters3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Chanel Chambers
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 4
3.58
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Donna Spero
published 3.5
3.15
Carolina Robayo
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
2.97
Halle Amick
published 3
2.91
Cheryl Smyth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Suzanne Hallquist
published
2.87
Sheza Healey
published
2.68
Smita Shukla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cindy Bohlin
published
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Smita Shukla + Cheryl Smyth5845% games+2.7% vs expected
Sheza Healey + Suzanne Hallquist134 matchesnot enough data
Sheza Healey + Donna Spero123 matchesnot enough data
Sheza Healey + Halle Amick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chanel Chambers
202W–97L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
256W–119L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Donna Spero
33W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–190L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Dawn Kleinman
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Halle Amick
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Cheryl Smyth
212W–231L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Suzanne Hallquist
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Sheza Healey
13W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Smita Shukla
194W–187L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Cindy Bohlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.