Teams

SC-Boinski

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-21vs SC-Half ShotsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnne Vogel / Muriel Blevins vs Laura Silvey / Jeana Paventy7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Greenfield vs Kathi Plager6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebbie Raabe / Jan Hardenbrook vs Garrett Benson / Heidi Downey0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Munson / Judy Stone vs Lisa Violette / Karen Barrett1-6, 3-6
2022-05-21vs PC-SisterWivesLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnne Vogel / Muriel Blevins vs Marnae Collins / Angela Cragin2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Greenfield vs Doreen Miller6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Dahm / Susan Boinski vs Kristi Dawson / Lisa Lindholm0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Munson / Jan Hardenbrook vs Robin Jorgensen / Jennifer Cunnington1-6, 3-6
2022-05-20vs YTC-WimbledivasLost 04
L#1 DoublesMuriel Blevins / Anne Vogel vs Michelle Gaberman / Lisa Watkins4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJessica Greenfield vs Kerry Steele2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJan Hardenbrook / Debbie Raabe vs Elizabeth Coon / Kristen Kegley1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Munson / Terri Dahm vs Beata Miller / Deborah Pessoa1-6, 1-6
2019-10-26vs SC-SteinerLost 01
L#3 DoublesTerri Dahm / Susan Boinski vs Nancy Bettesworth / Cheryl Stransky3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Jessica Greenfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Anne Vogel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Susan Boinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Debbie Raabe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Hardenbrook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Muriel Blevins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Munson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Dahm
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Greenfield + Susan Boinski4549% games−7.8% vs expected
Terri Dahm + Susan Boinski42036% games−9.6% vs expected
Anne Vogel + Muriel Blevins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Greenfield
36W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Anne Vogel
5W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.48
Susan Boinski
9W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.37
Debbie Raabe
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jan Hardenbrook
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Stone
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Muriel Blevins
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teri Munson
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terri Dahm
5W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.