Teams

WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Oshkosh Hammond

2022 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

7 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesRobert Galinsky / Kate Carroll vs Erica Shookman / Glen Sherman3-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTodd Hammond / Desiree Bongers vs Jeff Crowell / Theresa Palasota6-2, 5-5
L#3 DoublesDoug Carroll / Kaytrina Friedli vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Jack Palasota0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesTodd Hammond / Kate Carroll vs Erica Shookman / Jeff Crowell5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEthan Driscoll / Kaytrina Friedli vs Tara Sherman / Glen Sherman1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJoe Bongers / Kaytrina Friedli vs Tara Sherman / Glen Sherman5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Loker / Brian Driscoll vs Andy Taylor / Erica Shookman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Driscoll / Susie Loker vs Katie Oberstadt / Kyle Oberstadt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBrian Driscoll / Kate Carroll vs Patricia Lison-Sheikh / Chin-Yi Lin5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEthan Driscoll / Susie Loker vs Mary CameronOlson / Adam Goerlitz2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTodd Hammond / Kate Carroll vs Patricia Lison-Sheikh / Chin-Yi Lin3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Galinsky / Kaytrina Friedli vs Jackie Dumke / Adam Goerlitz1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusie Loker / Doug Carroll vs Maureen McGrath / Scott Springmier6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEthan Driscoll / Kate Carroll vs Maureen McGrath / Prakhar Bajpai3-6, 0-6
2022-06-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Driscoll / Kate Carroll vs Maureen McGrath / Prakhar Bajpai6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Neenah McGrath6215920180
2WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL GB Stasiak5315921184
3WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Oshkosh Hammond1761837247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Todd Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Kaytrina Friedli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Brian Driscoll
published
Kate Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Olivia Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Galinsky
published
Susie Loker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Hammond
54W–101L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Kaytrina Friedli
10W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Brian Driscoll
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Carroll
13W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Olivia Carroll
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Galinsky
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susie Loker
23W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.