Teams

SD 3.0WE LJTC (1PM)/ Covello

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesDemet Bucher / Aileen Nemrow vs Grace Daly / Danielle Mannweiler2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWendy Marchbanks vs Hayley Moore1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWen Liao / Janet Murphy vs Kara Henderson / Marley Bennett6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-15vs SD 3.0WE Mtn View/ LimonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLulu Ren / May Salyards vs Angela Cortez / KARLA FLORES6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-25vs SD 3.0WE Peninsula TC/ HagstromWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Ostrom / Jeanne Cummings vs Elayne Berman / Robin Osterhout4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWen Liao / May Salyards vs Anja Dixson / Caryn Rubanovich5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJill Ostrom / Laurie Lopez vs Melissa MacK / Marley Bennett6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Aileen Nemrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Jill Ostrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Lulu Ren
published
2.93
May Salyards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Terri Lundberg
published
2.72
Cecile Ward
published 3
2.66
Demet Bucher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Jeanne Cummings
published
2.27
Allyson Kreshak
published 2.5
JESSA SEVER
published
Jennifer Barrios
published
Kelly Covello
published
Wen Liao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Marchbanks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Cummings + Kelly Covello7272% games+15.8% vs expected
Jill Ostrom + May Salyards5064% games+8.1% vs expected
JESSA SEVER + Lulu Ren303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aileen Nemrow
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Jill Ostrom
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Lulu Ren
13W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
May Salyards
23W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Terri Lundberg
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cecile Ward
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Demet Bucher
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Jeanne Cummings
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Allyson Kreshak
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
JESSA SEVER
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Barrios
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Covello
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wen Liao
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Marchbanks
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.