Teams

HU - Kennamer

2025 TRI-LEVEL Night · Weekend 18 & Over - HSV

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-04vs HipkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Swegles / Joy Watson vs Jazzmine Jordan / Gabriela Revilla6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Rodriguez-Feo / Cristin Liveoak vs Elizabeth Burgreen / Stefanie Polk6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHannah Arendsen / Julie Satterfeal vs Kim Steigerwald / Laryssa Watson2-6, 2-6
2025-06-03vs HipkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmma Picaro / Joy Watson vs Jazzmine Jordan / Chrissy Moorer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenny Kennamer / Cristin Liveoak vs Lynn Dingo / Caroline Kimminau6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Satterfeal / Hannah Arendsen vs Laryssa Watson / Rachel Clark4-6, 4-6
2025-05-19vs HipkinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmma Picaro / Madison Swegles vs Gabriela Revilla / Callie Beckham6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHannah Arendsen / Sara Hastings vs Kim Steigerwald / Camille Bawcom1-6, 0-6
2025-05-19vs HipkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Swegles / Joy Watson vs Chrissy Moorer / Callie Beckham6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberley Loomis / Amy Rodriguez-Feo vs Stefanie Polk / Kristin Wilson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSara Hastings / Priscila Rodas vs Kim Steigerwald / Camille Bawcom1-6, 1-6
2025-05-09vs HipkinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmma Picaro / Kathy Smith vs Julie Hipkins / Gabriela Revilla6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJenny Kennamer / Cristin Liveoak vs Lynn Dingo / Elizabeth Burgreen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Satterfeal / Priscila Rodas vs Camille Bawcom / Laryssa Watson1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weekend 18 & Over - HSV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Emma Picaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Cristin Liveoak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Amy Rodriguez-Feo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Madison Swegles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Joy Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Jenny Kennamer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Kimberley Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Priscila Rodas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Julie Satterfeal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jillian Gerhart
published
2.17
Hannah Arendsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Sara Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscila Rodas + Julie Satterfeal2344% games+2.5% vs expected
Jenny Kennamer + Emma Picaro6456% games+1.1% vs expected
Hannah Arendsen + Sara Hastings2536% games−7.9% vs expected
Madison Swegles + Emma Picaro303 matchesnot enough data
Joy Watson + Amy Rodriguez-Feo123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Rodriguez-Feo + Cristin Liveoak303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Picaro
37W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Cristin Liveoak
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Amy Rodriguez-Feo
48W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Madison Swegles
29W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Joy Watson
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jenny Kennamer
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kimberley Loomis
64W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Priscila Rodas
36W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
Julie Satterfeal
27W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Jillian Gerhart
21W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
Hannah Arendsen
17W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Sara Hastings
14W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.