Teams

PTC-Melander/Messer

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Rachel Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Aj Messer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Christina Melander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Dan de Leon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.35
Reiko Maeda
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Megan Finn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Blake Simonsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Seth Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-03-10Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAj Messer / Joanna Asia Wagner vs Zack Hegge / Heike Droste6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan de Leon / Reiko Maeda vs Laurence Dupray / David Hoiland6-4, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Melander / Seth Wagner vs Kristin Bialobok / Phillip Hyun2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-09Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Adamsick / Seth Wagner vs Martin von Haartman / Shannon Chen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Crosson / Rachel Ritchie vs Jill Boyce / Rajan Madhusudan6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristina Melander / Blake Simonsen vs Hoon Shin / Janet Ha6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesJoanna Asia Wagner / Aj Messer vs Karin Owens / Doug Matheson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Blake Simonsen vs Elena Kochetkova / Steve Swan6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNobue Kaite / Seth Wagner vs Trina Newcomb / Robert Glenn6-4, 6-0
2024-02-24Won 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Finn / Aj Messer vs Susan Judge / Ken Pacioni6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaire Adamsick / Seth Wagner vs Teresa Metke / Jeffrey Metke6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNobue Kaite / Dan de Leon vs Monica Christensen / Kerry Sweet6-3, 7-5
2024-02-23Won 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Dan de Leon vs Vivek Kashyap / Heather Lee6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Finn / Scott Pennington vs Bill Henderson / Thu Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesReiko Maeda / Seth Wagner vs Scott Keeney / Deana Julka6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBlake Simonsen / Rachel Ritchie vs Lupine Swanson / Qiming Wang6-3, 6-3
2024-01-26Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDan de Leon / Reiko Maeda vs Zachary Wright / Kim Wright5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlake Simonsen / Claire Adamsick vs Chresten Gram / Barbara Gram6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Crosson / Christina Melander vs Christopher Graham / Heather Lee6-3, 6-4
2024-01-06Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAj Messer / Megan Finn vs Jocelyn Smith / Michael Won6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Melander / Dan de Leon vs Alana Rhea / Joe Trachta6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Ritchie
75W–19L career
0%67%33%
4.05
4
Aj Messer
5W–12L career
not enough data
4
Christina Melander
111W–81L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Dan de Leon
30W–28L career
22%78%0%
3.56
3.5
Reiko Maeda
76W–78L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Megan Finn
32W–17L career
0%98%2%
3.34
3.5
Blake Simonsen
44W–36L career
11%89%0%
3.11
3
Seth Wagner
51W–76L career
0%78%22%
3.02

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.