← Search

Candace Harris

— year-end
67 matches · 40W–27L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Candace Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2024-05-21 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Barnacle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2023-06-09 · GAC MAROON · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-06-08 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Barnacle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-06-01 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzie Erzinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-30 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2023-05-26 · GAC MAROON · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzie Erzinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-25 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-05-23 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Yonker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-19 · GAC MAROON · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Raben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2023-05-16 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Raben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-05 · GAC MAROON · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzie Erzinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2023-05-02 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Barnacle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams13 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.3% of games
8.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams