Teams

SSH BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-07-02vs SSLGT BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Ham / Elizabeth Leutwyler vs Carole Dagnon / Elizabeth Potarf1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Angie Sanders vs Inge Bentz / Marty Oliver7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRuth McIntyre / Denise van Essen vs Linda Smith / Polly Klaus7-6, 7-6
2021-06-25vs PRKR GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Angie Sanders vs Raylean Furnish / Tracy Monismith6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDenise van Essen / Ann Baldwin vs Denise Dickson / Patricia Ackerman6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLana Pierce / Candace Harris vs Susan Miles / Heidi Pennink6-3, 7-6
2021-06-11vs PCRK REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Leutwyler / Susan Ham vs Ann Habeger / Sally Avery6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Marty Smith vs Jody Mumaugh / Debra Stamatis6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Gingrich / Ann Baldwin vs Shari Procopio / Ellen Kiniry6-0, 6-1
2021-06-04vs GAC MAROONLost 12
L#1 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Denise van Essen vs Maria Angela Lutterbach / Carrie Raben6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Gingrich / Teresa Flecky vs Marli Davis / Elizabeth Horne6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLana Pierce / Ruth McIntyre vs Debbie Yoon / Rebecca Hite6-7, 4-6
2021-05-28vs SSHP ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Ham / Elizabeth Leutwyler vs Jayme Mansfield / Amy Meadows6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarty Smith / Denise van Essen vs Lani Reichardt / Julie Anderson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristine Gingrich / Candace Harris vs Dominique Fauble / Sabine Hatch6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2021-05-21vs CACI GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarty Smith / Jo Anna Cline vs Carla Ewing / Carol Keenan6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Sanders / Teresa Flecky vs Nanette Dahlstrom / Nola Nelson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCandace Harris / Susan Ham vs Mary Candee / Sherri Kelleher6-4, 6-2
2021-05-14vs KC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Angie Sanders vs Susan Conroy / Debbie Lathrop3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Marty Smith vs Jody Dart / Terri Jennings7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Denise van Essen vs Jill Strietelmeier / Meg Yarka4-6, 6-7
2021-05-08vs SSLGT BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarty Smith / Denise van Essen vs Jody Walker / Carole Dagnon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Ham / Elizabeth Leutwyler vs Elizabeth Potarf / Becky Hodous6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Candace Harris vs Linda Smith / Marty Oliver6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-07vs PRKR GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Angie Sanders vs Brenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Leutwyler / Susan Ham vs Diane Kosakowski / Diane Dahm6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRuth McIntyre / Lana Pierce vs Tracy Monismith / Raylean Furnish6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Marty Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Denise van Essen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Elizabeth Leutwyler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Teresa Flecky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Susan Ham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Ann Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Lana Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Ruth McIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christine Gingrich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jo Anna Cline
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Ham + Elizabeth Leutwyler201254% games−4.0% vs expected
Lana Pierce + Ruth McIntyre5650% games−8.0% vs expected
Denise van Essen + Marty Smith5063% gamesnot enough data
Lana Pierce + Ann Baldwin044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Baldwin + Teresa Flecky303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Ham + Denise van Essen123 matchesnot enough data
Marty Smith + Jo Anna Cline303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marty Smith
112W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Denise van Essen
30W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Leutwyler
46W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Teresa Flecky
64W–73L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Susan Ham
38W–42L career · 6 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.50
4
Ann Baldwin
24W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Lana Pierce
72W–101L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Ruth McIntyre
27W–42L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Christine Gingrich
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jo Anna Cline
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.