Teams

PCRK RED

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-25vs GAC MAROONWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Sally Avery vs Pamela Moss / Maria Angela Lutterbach6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Jody Mumaugh vs Carrie Raben / Gerri Keeley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShari Procopio / Lauren Burney vs Jane Lee / Susan Stahl6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-23vs SSHP ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Legrand / Debra Stamatis vs Amy Meadows / Jennifer Dawe2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry vs Michelle Zelinger / Dominique Fauble6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Burney / Ellen Kiniry vs Julie Anderson / Cindy Gee6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-11vs SSH BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Sally Avery vs Elizabeth Leutwyler / Susan Ham4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Debra Stamatis vs Jo Anna Cline / Marty Smith2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShari Procopio / Ellen Kiniry vs Christine Gingrich / Ann Baldwin0-6, 1-6
2021-06-04vs KC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Jody Mumaugh vs Susan Conroy / Jody Dart6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSally Avery / Debra Stamatis vs Kim McKay / Jill Strietelmeier1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Burney / Cindy Legrand vs Elizabeth Pike / Diane Willoughby4-6, 3-6
2021-05-28vs PRKR GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Avery / Ann Habeger vs Sarah Zhang / Diane Kosakowski6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Jody Mumaugh vs Debbie Sheehan / Linda Wevodau6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLauren Burney / Cindy Legrand vs Heidi Pennink / Sherri Hutcheon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-21vs SSLGT BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Sally Avery vs Becky Hodous / Inge Bentz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry vs Marla Roper / Ann Grace6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Stamatis / Lauren Burney vs Polly Klaus / Linda Smith5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-14vs CACI GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Barbara Gentry vs Nanette Dahlstrom / Chris Darrow7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Legrand / Shari Procopio vs Carla Ewing / Carol Keenan2-6, 2-6
2021-05-07vs GAC MAROONLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Jody Mumaugh vs Julie Meredith / Debbie Yoon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShari Procopio / Lauren Burney vs Gerri Keeley / Pamela Moss3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Legrand / Ellen Kiniry vs Elizabeth Horne / Susan Stahl1-6, 4-6
2021-04-30vs SSHP ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Shari Procopio vs Amy Meadows / Jayme Mansfield2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Legrand / Ann Habeger vs Sabine Hatch / Karla Elliot0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEllen Kiniry / Debra Stamatis vs Lani Reichardt / Dominique Fauble5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Jody Mumaugh
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.56
Ann Habeger
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.50
Barbara Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.47
Sally Avery
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Lauren Burney
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Debra Stamatis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Cindy Legrand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ellen Kiniry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shari Procopio
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Mumaugh + Ann Habeger8456% games+8.3% vs expected
Sally Avery + Debra Stamatis2643% games+5.1% vs expected
Lauren Burney + Debra Stamatis0839% games+2.8% vs expected
Sally Avery + Jody Mumaugh2645% games+1.9% vs expected
Sally Avery + Ann Habeger5256% games+0.9% vs expected
Lauren Burney + Ann Habeger3448% games−1.4% vs expected
Sally Avery + Barbara Gentry2745% games−1.6% vs expected
Jody Mumaugh + Barbara Gentry284845% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jody Mumaugh
81W–112L career · 8 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Ann Habeger
89W–85L career · type A · 8 lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Barbara Gentry
64W–118L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.50
Sally Avery
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lauren Burney
27W–66L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra Stamatis
43W–106L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
Cindy Legrand
3W–18L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ellen Kiniry
1W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shari Procopio
9W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.