← Search

Phillip Parrish

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Framingham, MA
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
17 matches · 3W–14L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-10-02 · LFW:Net Gains:Demarco · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria DeMarco mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-20 · LFW:Net Gains:DeMarco · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mireille Wankenne Pettiti mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-11-21 · LFW:Net Gains:Demarco · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria DeMarco mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · LFW:Net Gains:Demarco · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Casey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-26 · LFW:Net Gains:Demarco · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alisa Taylor mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-03-05 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml/Parrish · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Parrish mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-12 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Parrish mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2022-04-10 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Davida Dinerman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-04-03 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Parrish mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-20 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Parrish mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2022-02-06 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Parrish mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2021-05-09 · LFW:Longfellow:/Kreml · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with CariAnne Kreml mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe