Search

Davida Dinerman

Ashland, MA
5.0C year-end 2025
89 matches · 59W–30L · seasons 20192025
Where Davida sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Davida is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams39 teams · 2002–2025
LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Kreml/Liang
2025 Ema Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.5 Women
2025
NewEngland/Ebbert/18&Over5.0W
2025 Ema Adult 18 & Over Women · 5.0 Women
2025
LFNT:Natick:Schuermann/Dinerman
2025 Ema Adult 55 & Over Women · 9.0 Women
2025
LFNT:Natick:Schuermann/Bass
2024 Ema Adult 55 & Over Women · 9.0 Women Flt 1/3
2024
LFW:Wayland:Sumner
2024 Ema Adult 18 & Over Women · 5.0 Women 1/3
2024
LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Carroll/Sumner
2023 Ema Adult 18 & Over Women · 5.0 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Davida has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.02019202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Davida has gone from the 100th to the 100th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
95%
19W–1L · 76.2% of games
5.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
9.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 60.5% of games
9.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
W
Priscilla Martinezchamps
2025-10-25 · #1 Singles
0.032about as expected — took 71% of games against 75% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Aileen Priorchamps
2025-10-25 · #1 Singles
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-24 · #1 Singles
0.015better than expected — took 80% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Katherine Foulkchamps
2025-10-24 · #1 Singles
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Camille Madden / Nancy Nevilschamps
2025-09-14 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Corey
0.034below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Lisa Finneral / Barbara Baileychamps
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Corey
+0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jamie Taffetchamps
2025-09-06 · #1 Singles
+0.022better than expected — took 92% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Dana Bacalla
2025-07-30 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.077better than expected — took 75% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Victoria Aiello
2025-07-16 · #1 Singles · 5.0
0.001about as expected — took 39% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 5-4
W
Debra Shapiro / Mary MacDonald
2025-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen McNamara
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-09 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.101better than expected — took 80% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Lauren Crowley
2025-07-08 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.