Search

Pamela Jeppson

Bloomfield, CT
5.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 58W–9L · seasons 20202026
Where Pamela sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Pamela is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams81 teams · 2017–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has played at 4.0, 5.0 across 2 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.55.020212026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 68.8% of games
9.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 71.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
W
Natasha Sauerborn
2026-07-22 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.003better than expected — took 68% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Eugenia Kovalev
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 5.0
0.021below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jessica McNamara
2026-07-01 · #1 Singles · 5.0
0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
ASTI ADAMS / Nicole Bretingchamps
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Lomenzo
+0.052better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Jonathan Sanders / Sadie Campanellachamps
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Matti Teittinen
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jill Markowitz / Donald Hooverchamps
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Lomenzo
+0.021better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Simona Kylberger / Jennifer Cunningham
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Connie Chiang
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Cecily Wiswall / Hannah McColgan
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Maria Pylypiv
0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Daniella Patton
2026-06-17 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.015better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 5-2
L
Jenna Schmid / Connie Chiang
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sarah Wallach
0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Daniella Patton
2026-06-10 · #1 Singles · 5.0
0.008about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Gabriella Heaney-Secord
2026-06-03 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.005about as expected — took 61% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.