← Search

Simona Kylberger

Wayland, MA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 112W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Simona Kylberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Daniel Rodefeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · LFNT:Natick:Ebbert · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anna Makarova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Erik Ratta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Anna Makarova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Ben Abraham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jennifer Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gabriella Heaney-Secord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · LFNT:Natick:Ebbert · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lindsay Ebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sadie Campanella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jennifer Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · LFNT:Natick:Ebbert · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lindsay Ebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-20 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Anna Makarova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.8% of games
4.5
75.6%
31W–10L · 59% of games
5.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 59.5% of games
10.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
90%
18W–2L · 66.2% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
20W–12L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams