← Search

Mark Troutman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
KERNERSVILLE, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 15W–4L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history19 matches
W
2024-05-01 · Burns 9.0M 55s Wed · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Corthum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-04-17 · Burns 9.0M 55s Wed · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alex Rucker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-05-03 · Burns 9.0 55 Wed. · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Sawyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-04-19 · Burns 9.0 55 Wed. · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Fred Pfuhl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-05 · Burns 9.0 55 Wed. · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Jenkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-03-08 · Burns 9.0 55 Wed. · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Dean
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-06-04 · Burns 55s 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Fred Pfuhl championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-03-30 · Burns 55s 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Leatherwood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-03-20 · Burns 55s 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Morris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2021-05-30 · Westwood · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chuck Burns
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2021-04-18 · Westwood · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Morris
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2021-04-17 · Westwood · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chuck Burns
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46% of games
9.0
100%
13W–0L · 65.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams