← Search

Jim Jenkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pinehurst, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 19W–0L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history19 matches
W
Default
2026-05-06 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Leatherwood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-01 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eric Anthony
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-18 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Corthum
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-03-26 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Dean
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-19 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Duane Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-04-10 · Burns 9.0M 55s Wed · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chuck Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-03-27 · Burns 9.0M 55s Wed · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Sawyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-04-05 · Burns 9.0 55 Wed. · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Troutman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-03-29 · Burns 9.0 55 Wed. · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lee Picklesimer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-05-11 · Burns 55s 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Auger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-04-06 · Burns 55s 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andy Wilkison
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-03-20 · Burns 55s 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chuck Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
9.0
100%
19W–0L · 69.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer