← Search

Eric Anthony

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 69W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history108 matches
W
Default
2026-10-15 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charley Eberhard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-22 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Thoma
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Thoma
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Peter Novosad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Vescio
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lee Picklesimer championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lee Picklesimer championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Vescio
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Dean championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Phil Payne championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Johnson
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-10 · Burns 18s 5.0M Sun PM · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chuck Burns
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.6% of games
4.5
45%
9W–11L · 49.9% of games
5.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.5% of games
8.5
50%
15W–15L · 52.7% of games
9.0
82.4%
28W–6L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer