← Search

Michael Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GREENSBORO, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 72W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history97 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brad Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-29 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Altmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-22 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Bryce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Altmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Philip Kuntz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mason Norman
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Philip Kuntz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rob Campbell
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-12 · Houston/Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Hitchcock
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenny Winter
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-14 · Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Leatherwood
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-07 · Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Anthony
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
75.4%
43W–14L · 59.4% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.1% of games
8.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 59.4% of games
4.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 59.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#3 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King