← Search

Christopher Bryce

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 98W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-10-01 · Fleihan/Winter 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Neil Henderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-22 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-18 · Winter 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5 Men Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rich Dowler championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · Winter 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5 Men Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rich Dowler championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-17 · Winter 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5 Men Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Thoma championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-09-17 · Winter 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5 Men Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Thoma championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianna Bryce mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianna Bryce mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-08 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jay Hitchcock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jay Hitchcock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-29 · Bryce 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianna Bryce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Bryce 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianna Bryce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 60.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games
8.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 58.5% of games
4.0mixed
88.5%
23W–3L · 66% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 62.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams