← Search

Bryan Skelton

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 54W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Bryan Skelton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-09-09 · JNichols (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rod Spence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · JNichols (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eric Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · JNichols (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eric Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Patrick Nitsche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Trevor Mallioux / Karthik Nayani
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Daniel Nunn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick Nitsche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Jon Michael Thomas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Alfie Cheng / Benson Good
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Jacob Huffaker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Stephen Nettelhorst / Keith Wilson
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · with James Nichols championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Nitsche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.9% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
60%
12W–8L · 54.8% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert