← Search

CJ ONeill

MATTHEWS, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 68W–52L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add CJ ONeill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-08-25 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Bartholomy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · PGibson/Kapoor (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Philip Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · JChung/LBanchik (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sean Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · PGibson/Kapoor (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Philip Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · NSiens/JChung (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jarrett Meadors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Van ONeill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Van ONeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · KSathyamoorthy (Lifetime) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidya Kondabathini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · KSathyamoorthy (Lifetime) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidya Kondabathini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-30 · RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Van ONeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-24 · KSathyamoorthy (Lifetime) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidya Kondabathini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Eccleston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
50%
23W–23L · 51% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 42.4% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.2% of games
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.8% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe