← Search

Phillip Osborne

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 37W–47L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Phillip Osborne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-27 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Olsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · RO'Rourke/DTyson (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Griset mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Spera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · RO'Rourke/DTyson (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Olsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Robinette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Olsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · RO'Rourke/DTyson (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Robinette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-18 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Childs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-21 · THodge (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chirag Dua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-09 · THodge (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie ORourke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-16 · KFox/BStover (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Shore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-13 · RGogate/BHood (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shravan Manda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.5% of games
3.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 50.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 44.2% of games
7.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 53% of games
3.5mixed
25%
4W–12L · 41.4% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams