← Search

Kate Brittain

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Browns Summit, NC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 39W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history60 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Haynes championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-10 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bettinger championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bettinger championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-09 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bettinger championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-09 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bettinger championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Haynes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-29 · Marus 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Marus championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Huffines championship
loading the estimate
2-2
L
2026-09-19 · Bettinger 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Huffines championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-18 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63%
29W–17L · 56.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
100%
6W–0L · 61.2% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova