← Search

Aundrea Hendley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jamestown, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 107W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history177 matches
L
2026-09-26 · Mays 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Deena Samuel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dia Roberts championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-18 · Mays 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Deena Samuel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · Mays 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bridget Gislimberti
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · Mays 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Whitney Ellis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/40+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dia Roberts
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/40+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Helms
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/40+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Helms
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Johnson 40s 4.5W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Oldham
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · Johnson 40s 4.5W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dia Roberts
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · Johnson 40s 4.5W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Oldham
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Johnson 40s 4.5W Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kissie Stroup
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 68.8% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
57.6%
38W–28L · 52.4% of games
7.5
100%
10W–0L · 65.2% of games
8.5
48.1%
25W–27L · 51.2% of games
9.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams