← Search

Jennifer Chiaramonti

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 40W–15L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history55 matches
W
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Danford championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Gill championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · Marus/Danford 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marla Barnwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · Bell/Gill 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angela McGinn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-30 · Marus/Danford 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Layne Saunders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-25 · Bell/Gill 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Layne Saunders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Gill championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Danford championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Gill championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-18 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Danford championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Speight championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-17 · Danford 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Gill championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
74.3%
26W–9L · 58.9% of games
8.5
70%
14W–6L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal