← Search

Marla Barnwell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
276 matches · 180W–96L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history276 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Nutt 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Harris championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Morgan Danford championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-07 · Marus/Danford 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Chiaramonti
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · Nutt 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela McGinn championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Riley championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-09 · Dean 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marian Hogan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-09 · Marus/Danford 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annabel Weyand Norman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-09 · Nutt 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Dean 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Nutt 40s 8.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · Marus/Danford 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Bell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
62.8%
76W–45L · 55% of games
4.5
50%
14W–14L · 47.7% of games
7.5
71.4%
20W–8L · 56% of games
8.5
78.6%
44W–12L · 61.4% of games
4.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
75 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer