← Search

Leigh Abraham

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
310 matches · 181W–129L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history310 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-13 · Marus 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-05 · Abraham 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claire Cooke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-02 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-01 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Haynes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-24 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-23 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-22 · Marus 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · Abraham 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claire Cooke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-04 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline Herron
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams99 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 68.1% of games
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.4% of games
3.5
71.8%
28W–11L · 62.7% of games
4.0
48.8%
42W–44L · 50.1% of games
4.5
40%
10W–15L · 49% of games
6.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 63.6% of games
7.5
62.5%
40W–24L · 55.6% of games
8.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 44.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
69 matches
#2 Singles
11%
35 matches
#1 Singles
8%
24 matches
#3 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert