← Search

Jordan Hedrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 72W–36L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history108 matches
W
2026-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristi Nicholson championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-24 · Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Timcheck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-09-23 · Strassell 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erin Pate
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristi Nicholson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Strassell 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Penley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Timcheck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · Strassell 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Parsons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Speight 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Strassell
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Speight 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Nutt
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-15 · Speight 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Parsons
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · Speight 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Dunning
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Speight 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layne Saunders
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
95.7%
22W–1L · 73.1% of games
4.0
58.3%
21W–15L · 57.9% of games
4.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 46.5% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.1% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.9% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Singles
22%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert