← Search

Aphton Lang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 56W–45L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history101 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Walker championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-17 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-09-14 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Vartanian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-03 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-17 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joanna Ashe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Vartanian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Della Crone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Dagger-Wilson 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Boswell
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-03 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Vartanian
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Frannie Benfield
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Dagger-Wilson 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosa Phillips
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 59.5% of games
3.0
50%
16W–16L · 51.7% of games
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.4% of games
5.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.1% of games
6.5
70%
14W–6L · 56.3% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#2 Singles
13%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova