← Search

Holly Parr

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 133W–101L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history234 matches
L
2026-09-23 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-18 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5W Combo Friday AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Porter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Mickleberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Broadstreet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aphton Lang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5W Combo Friday AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thanawan Hahn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-13 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Parr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5W Combo Friday AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Broadstreet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-01 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Jones
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Beeson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela McGinn
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
63.2%
67W–39L · 57.3% of games
4.5
52.8%
28W–25L · 51.6% of games
7.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.1% of games
8.5
43.6%
24W–31L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
43 matches
#1 Singles
13%
31 matches
#2 Singles
9%
21 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer